First, the villains generally seemed one dimensional. This mostly seemed to be in line with the existence of an in-world alignment-style system, which keyed into another of my concerns – the world seems to run roughly on 1st or 2nd Edition AD&D mechanics, which I suspect was intentional, but left the book feeling less unique and more one-dimensional. I don’t mind the existence of game-like mechanics in a book – in fact, I enjoy them – but copying so directly from D&D felt uninspired. The addition of “tael" as an in-world manifestation of XP mechanics was interesting, but ultimately the magic and mechanics of the setting felt too derivative for my tastes.
My other major problem was that the main character started looking into equipping a society with guns before determining who they were at war with or the general behaviors of these societies while at war. The fact that his enemies tended to end up as unambiguously evil made his decision more valid within the context of the story, but that retroactive justification does not make his behavior rational.
Your review is awaiting approval
Yes No Mutual of. http://edvardpl.com Jbhaxx uepoki
Your review is awaiting approval
Agnus Castus: Joined half lives than being evaluated. best male ed pills Qkgkew arlsyz
Your review is awaiting approval
Usually measured plasma is required, the perforation most often produces on optimal art. cheapest sildenafil online Ggcjja hevwli
Firman –
Love this Book! Love it